Camel City Lumber Co. v. Ingram
155 S.E. 925, 199 N.C. 812, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 275
Opinion
The record discloses no exceptive assignment of error of sufficient merit to warrant a reversal of the judgment. Hence, it will not be disturbed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camel City Lumber Co. v. Ingram, 155 S.E. 925, 199 N.C. 812, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 275 (N.C. 1930).
155 S.E. 925 (Camel City Lumber Co. v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steelman v. . Benfield
46 S.E.2d 829 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)