Camden v. State
869 S.W.2d 861, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 156, 1994 WL 23888
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Wilson Camden, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for possession of a controlled substance for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for eight years.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camden v. State, 869 S.W.2d 861, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 156, 1994 WL 23888 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
869 S.W.2d 861 (Camden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.