Camden v. AMSEC Corp.

495 F. App'x 389
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1185
StatusPublished

This text of 495 F. App'x 389 (Camden v. AMSEC Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camden v. AMSEC Corp., 495 F. App'x 389 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Edward Camden appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint in which he sought enforcement of attorney’s fee orders issued in a proceeding under the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Camden v. AMSEC Corp., No. 2:11-cv-00554-AWA-FBS (E.D.Va. Jan. 20, 2012). We grant Appel-lee’s motion to reactivate the stayed appeal, and deny Camden’s motion seeking judgment approving settlement of the parties. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 901-950
33 U.S.C. § 901-950
§ 901
33 U.S.C. § 901

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
495 F. App'x 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camden-v-amsec-corp-ca4-2012.