Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 25, 2015·No. 02-15-00336-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00336-CV

CAMDEN HOLDINGS OF NC, LLC APPELLANTS AND CAMDEN HOLDINGS OF TN, LLC

V.

RICCA CHEMICAL COMPANY, LLC APPELLEES AND POCCO, LLC

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 096-280020-15

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered “Appellants’ Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”

It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: November 25, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC (Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.