Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00336-CV
CAMDEN HOLDINGS OF NC, LLC APPELLANTS AND CAMDEN HOLDINGS OF TN, LLC
V.
RICCA CHEMICAL COMPANY, LLC APPELLEES AND POCCO, LLC
------------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 096-280020-15
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered “Appellants’ Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”
It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: November 25, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC (Camden Holdings of NC, LLC and Camden Holdings of TN, LLC v. Ricca Chemical Company, LLC and Pocco, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.