Camco Enterprises, Inc. v. Record Wide Distributors, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Camco Enterprises, Inc. v. Record Wide Distributors, Inc.

856 S.W.2d 131, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1033, 1993 WL 254679

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 6, 1993

DocketNo. 62388

StatusPublished

This text of 856 S.W.2d 131 (Camco Enterprises, Inc. v. Record Wide Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camco Enterprises, Inc. v. Record Wide Distributors, Inc., 856 S.W.2d 131, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1033, 1993 WL 254679 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Suit on statement of account. Appellant (Buyer) appeals from a judgment in favor of Respondent (Seller) in the sum of $9,759.96 in a court-tried case.

The evidence shows Buyer ordered merchandise from Seller. Seller delivered the merchandise to Buyer. Buyer paid two installments on the purchase price but did not pay a third and final installment when due. See, Welsch Furnace Co., Inc. v. Vescovo, 805 S.W.2d 727, 728[1, 2] (Mo.App.1991); Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Groeper, 691 S.W.2d 395, 397[1] (Mo.App.1985).

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI