Camcio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Camcio v. State

448 So. 2d 1251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13075

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 1, 1984·No. No. 83-290·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to show reversible error in the trial court’s ruling denying his motion to suppress a post-arrest statement. See State v. Delgado-Armenta, 429 So.2d 328 (Fla.1983); Keeton v. State, 427 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the conviction on the charge of trafficking in methaqualone is hereby affirmed. The conviction and sentence on the charge of possession of methaqualone, a lesser included offense of the trafficking charge, is impermissible under the authority of Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). Therefore, the conviction is hereby reversed and the sentence vacated.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to show reversible error in the trial court’s ruling denying his motion to suppress a post-arrest statement. See State v. Delgado-Armenta, 429 So.2d 328 (Fla.1983); Keeton v. State, 427 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the conviction on the charge of trafficking in methaqualone is hereby affirmed. The conviction and sentence on the charge of possession of methaqualone, a lesser included offense of the trafficking charge, is impermissible under the authority of Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). Therefore, the conviction is hereby reversed and the sentence vacated.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Camcio v. State, 448 So. 2d 1251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

448 So. 2d 1251 (Camcio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related