Camcio v. State

448 So. 2d 1251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13075
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1984
DocketNo. 83-290
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 448 So. 2d 1251 (Camcio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camcio v. State, 448 So. 2d 1251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to show reversible error in the trial court’s ruling denying his motion to suppress a post-arrest statement. See State v. Delgado-Armenta, 429 So.2d 328 (Fla.1983); Keeton v. State, 427 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the conviction on the charge of trafficking in methaqualone is hereby affirmed. The conviction and sentence on the charge of possession of methaqualone, a lesser included offense of the trafficking charge, is impermissible under the authority of Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). Therefore, the conviction is hereby reversed and the sentence vacated.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cabo v. State
459 So. 2d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 1251, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camcio-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.