Cambridge Society v. Elliot

50 Misc. 159
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 50 Misc. 159 (Cambridge Society v. Elliot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cambridge Society v. Elliot, 50 Misc. 159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

O'Gorman, J.

The defendant agreed to buy a book at a stipulated price, to be paid in installments, the title to remain in the vendor until the payment of the last installment. The following day the defendant, in writing, cancelled the order, and refused to accept the book when the same was tendered. This action was brought to recover the contract price and the judgment for the plaintiff is; criticized on the ground that, the title not having been transferred to the buyer, the seller’s sole remedy is an action for damages representing the difference between the contract price and the market value. National Cash Reg. Co. v. Schmidt, 48 App. Div. 473, is cited as an authority in support of this proposition. But this court in Cash Register v. Zinnio, 39 Misc. Rep. 311, held, in a similar case, that an action might be brought for the contract price and the Appellate Division in the Third Department in Gray v. Booth, 64 App. Div. 231, reached the same conclusion and refused to follow National Cash v. Schmidt, supra.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Scott and Newburger, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Cash Register Co. v. Schmidt
48 A.D. 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Gray v. Booth
64 A.D. 231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Ideal Cash Register Co. v. Zunino
39 Misc. 311 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Misc. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cambridge-society-v-elliot-nyappterm-1906.