Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cambridge Factors, Inc. v. Steiner

Cambridge Factors, Inc. v. Steiner

197 A.D.2d 362, 603 N.Y.S.2d 733
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 362 (Cambridge Factors, Inc. v. Steiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cambridge Factors, Inc. v. Steiner, 197 A.D.2d 362, 603 N.Y.S.2d 733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered November 9, 1992, which, inter alia, denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to serve a late answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs..

Appellant failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his three year delay. (CPLR 3012 [d]; see, Abra Constr. Corp. v Hazelton Realty Corp., 105 AD2d 657.) Nor has appellant set forth a meritorious defense (see, Chinnici v Tonvin Realty Corp., 88 AD2d 609). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chinnici v. Tonvin Realty Corp.
88 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Abra Construction Corp. v. Hazelton Realty Corp.
105 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 362, 603 N.Y.S.2d 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cambridge-factors-inc-v-steiner-nyappdiv-1993.