Cambridge Co. v. Telsat, Inc.

884 N.E.2d 70, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1463
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 2008·No. 2008-0646·Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23935, 2008-0hio-1056. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay and appellee’s motion to dismiss,

It is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant the motion for stay. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cambridge Co. v. Telsat, Inc., 884 N.E.2d 70, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2008).

884 N.E.2d 70 (Cambridge Co. v. Telsat, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.