Cambria Steamship Company v. Morrow Steamship Company

Sixth Circuit

Cambria Steamship Company v. Morrow Steamship Company

182 F.2d 347, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 1, 1950

Docket11073_1

StatusPublished

This text of 182 F.2d 347 (Cambria Steamship Company v. Morrow Steamship Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cambria Steamship Company v. Morrow Steamship Company, 182 F.2d 347, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

182 F.2d 347

CAMBRIA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Claimant and Appellant, Steamer
'Daniel J. Morrell', Respondent and Appellant,
v.
The MORROW STEAMSHIP COMPANY, a corporation, as owner of the
Steamer Robert J. Paisley, Libelant and Appellee.

No. 11073.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

May 1, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur A. Koscinski, Judge.

Russell V. Bleecker, Cleveland, Ohio and Richard A. Forsyth, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Johnson, Branand & Jaeger, Cleveland, Ohio and Foster & Lutz, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment be and the same is hereby affirmed in accordance with the findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the District Court. 90 F.Supp. 300.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI