Cambria Iron Co. v. Laclede Wire & Fence Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Cambria Iron Co. v. Laclede Wire & Fence Co.

26 F. 420, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 1958

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

DecidedFebruary 5, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 26 F. 420 (Cambria Iron Co. v. Laclede Wire & Fence Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cambria Iron Co. v. Laclede Wire & Fence Co., 26 F. 420, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 1958 (circtedmo 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Teeat, ■],

Under the agreed statement of facts there is only one question to be determined, viz., whether the lien of an attachment, after wages earned, cuts off the demand for said wages under section 761, Rev. St. Mo. The obvious purpose of such statute is to make the property of a corporation specially subject to the wages therein named, unless there was, prior to the earning of said wages, a specific lien. A subsequent lien by attachment does not deprive the laborer for wages earned, from priority of right therefor.

Demurrer to intervening petition overruled. Payment ordered to the intervenor of the balance in the hands of the marshal, less the costs oí said intervention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teeat, ■],

Under the agreed statement of facts there is only one question to be determined, viz., whether the lien of an attachment, after wages earned, cuts off the demand for said wages under section 761, Rev. St. Mo. The obvious purpose of such statute is to make the property of a corporation specially subject to the wages therein named, unless there was, prior to the earning of said wages, a specific lien. A subsequent lien by attachment does not deprive the laborer for wages earned, from priority of right therefor.

Demurrer to intervening petition overruled. Payment ordered to the intervenor of the balance in the hands of the marshal, less the costs oí said intervention.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F. 420, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 1958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cambria-iron-co-v-laclede-wire-fence-co-circtedmo-1886.