Cambio v. Narragansett Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Cambio v. Narragansett Brewing Co.

392 A.2d 926, 120 R.I. 1008

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 10, 1978·No. Appeal No. 77-35·Published

Opinion

This case comes before the court on an order to show cause why the decree of the full commission should not be affirmed.

Upon consideration of the briefs of petitioner and respondent, we are of the opinion that there is evidence in the record to support the finding of the full commission that the incapacity of the petitioner which commenced on February 25, 1976, was caused by an aggravation of his original injury and not be a recurrence thereof.

The decree of the full commission is affirmed, the appeal is denied and dismissed, and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case comes before the court on an order to show cause why the decree of the full commission should not be affirmed.

Upon consideration of the briefs of petitioner and respondent, we are of the opinion that there is evidence in the record to support the finding of the full commission that the incapacity of the petitioner which commenced on February 25, 1976, was caused by an aggravation of his original injury and not be a recurrence thereof.

The decree of the full commission is affirmed, the appeal is denied and dismissed, and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Commission.

Cambio v. Narragansett Brewing Co., 392 A.2d 926, 120 R.I. 1008 (R.I. 1978).

Pincite

392 A.2d 926 (Cambio v. Narragansett Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.