Cambas v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Cambas v. City of New York

35 N.E.2d 187, 285 N.Y. 781, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1763

DecidedMay 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 35 N.E.2d 187 (Cambas v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cambas v. City of New York, 35 N.E.2d 187, 285 N.Y. 781, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1763 (N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court,.and in the Appellate Division. Questions of fact were presented both in regard to defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. We find no reversible error in the charge.

Concur: Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., and Finch, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court,.and in the Appellate Division. Questions of fact were presented both in regard to defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. We find no reversible error in the charge.

Concur: Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., and Finch, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 N.E.2d 187, 285 N.Y. 781, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cambas-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1941.