Cambareri v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
185 Misc. 273, 56 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2049
Opinion
The jury should have been permitted to determine whether or not plaintiff unusually exerted himself (Simson v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Assn., 263 App. Div. 297) or whether or not plaintiff’s injury was the natural or probable result of his voluntary act or an unforeseen consequence. (Meyer v. New York Life Insurance Co., 249 App. Div. 243).
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hammer, Shientao and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cambareri v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 185 Misc. 273, 56 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
185 Misc. 273 (Cambareri v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meyer v. New York Life Insurance
249 A.D. 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Simson v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
263 A.D. 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)