Cambareri v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 185 Misc. 273 (Cambareri v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The jury should have been permitted to determine whether or not plaintiff unusually exerted himself (Simson v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Assn., 263 App. Div. 297) or whether or not plaintiff’s injury was the natural or probable result of his voluntary act or an unforeseen consequence. (Meyer v. New York Life Insurance Co., 249 App. Div. 243).
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hammer, Shientao and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 Misc. 273, 56 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cambareri-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappterm-1945.