Camaro v. AVR Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Camaro v. AVR Realty Co.

259 A.D.2d 723, 685 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 723 (Camaro v. AVR Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camaro v. AVR Realty Co., 259 A.D.2d 723, 685 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Brisbane Associates and Waldbaums appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated August 25, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s conclusion that there are issues of fact warranting a trial, such that the appellants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see, e.g., Glick v City of New York, 139 AD2d 402). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Brisbane Associates and Waldbaums appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated August 25, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s conclusion that there are issues of fact warranting a trial, such that the appellants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see, e.g., Glick v City of New York, 139 AD2d 402). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 723, 685 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camaro-v-avr-realty-co-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack