Camargo v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Camargo v. State

969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 223

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Camargo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 337 Ark. 105 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 16, 1998·No. CR 98-772·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Rafael Camargo, by his attorney, Robert C. Marquette, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Rafael Camargo, by his attorney, Robert C. Marquette, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Camargo v. State, 969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 223 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

969 S.W.2d 666 (Camargo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.