Camargo v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Camargo v. State

969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 223

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 16, 1998

DocketCR 98-772

StatusPublished

This text of 969 S.W.2d 666 (Camargo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camargo v. State, 969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 223 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Rafael Camargo, by his attorney, Robert C. Marquette, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Rafael Camargo, by his attorney, Robert C. Marquette, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 S.W.2d 666, 334 Ark. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camargo-v-state-ark-1998.