Camardella v. Eastern Parkway Roller Skating Rink, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Camardella v. Eastern Parkway Roller Skating Rink, Inc.

271 A.D.2d 985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 985 (Camardella v. Eastern Parkway Roller Skating Rink, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camardella v. Eastern Parkway Roller Skating Rink, Inc., 271 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

The action is on five promissory notes aggregating $5,900. Defendant, for a separate defense, alleges that although the notes were payable two and four months after date, prior to or contemporaneous with the execution and delivery of the notes plaintiff agreed that the same would not be presented for payment until three years after date, unless defendant’s board of directors decided that there was a sufficient cash surplus to pay the notes or any of them at an earlier date. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, the motion granted, with $10 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, as demanded in the complaint. The allegations as to the parol agreements do not establish a valid defense. Since there is no triable issue, it was error to deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is on five promissory notes aggregating $5,900. Defendant, for a separate defense, alleges that although the notes were payable two and four months after date, prior to or contemporaneous with the execution and delivery of the notes plaintiff agreed that the same would not be presented for payment until three years after date, unless defendant’s board of directors decided that there was a sufficient cash surplus to pay the notes or any of them at an earlier date. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, the motion granted, with $10 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, as demanded in the complaint. The allegations as to the parol agreements do not establish a valid defense. Since there is no triable issue, it was error to deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camardella-v-eastern-parkway-roller-skating-rink-inc-nyappdiv-1947.