Camarda v. Hastie
This text of 13 A.D.2d 993 (Camarda v. Hastie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 7, 1961, which denied his motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D.2d 993, 218 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camarda-v-hastie-nyappdiv-1961.