Camarda v. CITY OF EATON RAPIDS
737 N.W.2d 735, 480 Mich. 853
This text of 737 N.W.2d 735 (Camarda v. CITY OF EATON RAPIDS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Camarda v. CITY OF EATON RAPIDS, 737 N.W.2d 735, 480 Mich. 853 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Kyle and Lisa CAMARDA, James and Janice Fry, Todd and Diane Peltier, Donnamarie Ruggiano, Janice Schwartz, and Elizabeth Vandeventer, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 N.W.2d 735, 480 Mich. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camarda-v-city-of-eaton-rapids-mich-2007.