Camarda v. CITY OF EATON RAPIDS
737 N.W.2d 735, 480 Mich. 853
Opinion
Kyle and Lisa CAMARDA, James and Janice Fry, Todd and Diane Peltier, Donnamarie Ruggiano, Janice Schwartz, and Elizabeth Vandeventer, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camarda v. CITY OF EATON RAPIDS, 737 N.W.2d 735, 480 Mich. 853 (Mich. 2007).
737 N.W.2d 735 (Camarda v. CITY OF EATON RAPIDS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.