Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 21, 2014
DocketMisc. No. 2014-0128
StatusPublished

This text of Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc (Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc, (D.D.C. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00096-RM-KMT

JEFFREY M. CAMARDA, and KIMBERLY K. CAMARDA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS INC.,

Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF TRANSFER ______________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER coming before the Court on the Motion to Quash Subpoenas Duces

Tecum filed in this matter by non-parties Lee Mickus, Esq. and John Connell (ECF No. 2) and

the Court being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds and orders as follows:

1. This matter arises out of a civil action pending in the United States District Court,

District of Columbia, captioned Jeffrey M. Camarda, et al v. Certified Financial Planner Board

of Standards, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:2013-cv-00871-RJL.

2. This matter seeks to quash subpoenas for depositions in this district, which

subpoenas were issued by the above-referenced court.

3. This matter is governed by Rule 45(f), Fed.R.Civ.P., which now authorizes the

transfer of a subpoena-related motion by the court where compliance is sought to the issuing court. Before any such transfer may occur, however, the person subject to the subpoena must

consent to the transfer or this Court must find the existence of exceptional circumstances.

4. In this instance, the parties subject to the subpoenas have expressly consented to

transfer of this matter to the issuing court.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

THAT this matter is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District

of Columbia in accordance with Rule 45(f), Fed.R.Civ.P.

DATED this 21st day of January, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camarda-v-certified-financial-planner-board-of-sta-dcd-2014.