Camarco Contractors, Inc. v. R. J. Marshall, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Camarco Contractors, Inc. v. R. J. Marshall, Inc.

18 A.D.2d 835, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 835 (Camarco Contractors, Inc. v. R. J. Marshall, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camarco Contractors, Inc. v. R. J. Marshall, Inc., 18 A.D.2d 835, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose certain mechanics’ liens filed against a public improvement, in which the defendant corporation, Edward Ehrbar, Inc., in its answer asserted a cross claim (Civ. Prac. Act, § 264) against the plaintiff and the other defendants in the action based upon liens alleged to have been filed by it against the [836]*836same public improvement, the defendants, R. J. Marshall, Inc., and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated July 11, 1962, and entered in Putnam County August 24, 1962, which denied their motion fpr summary judgment in their favor and against said defendant corporation Edward Ehrbar, Inc. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose certain mechanics’ liens filed against a public improvement, in which the defendant corporation, Edward Ehrbar, Inc., in its answer asserted a cross claim (Civ. Prac. Act, § 264) against the plaintiff and the other defendants in the action based upon liens alleged to have been filed by it against the [836]*836same public improvement, the defendants, R. J. Marshall, Inc., and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated July 11, 1962, and entered in Putnam County August 24, 1962, which denied their motion fpr summary judgment in their favor and against said defendant corporation Edward Ehrbar, Inc. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 835, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camarco-contractors-inc-v-r-j-marshall-inc-nyappdiv-1963.