Camara v. Holder

470 F. App'x 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2012·No. No. 11-1824·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mabinty Camara, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Camara’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Camara (B.I.A. June 28, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [192] presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camara v. Holder, 470 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2012).

470 F. App'x 191 (Camara v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related