Camaione v. Marzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Camaione v. Marzo

55 A.D.3d 1405, 864 N.Y.S.2d 367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 2008

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.3d 1405 (Camaione v. Marzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camaione v. Marzo, 55 A.D.3d 1405, 864 N.Y.S.2d 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered September 14, 2007 in an action for, inter alia, wrongful death. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant LaFayette Central School District, by and through its agents, officers, and/or em[1406]*1406ployees, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claim against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the complaint and cross claim against defendant LaFayette Central School District, by and through its agents, officers, and/or employees, are dismissed.

Same memorandum as in Davis v Marzo (55 AD3d 1404 [2008]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Fahey, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered September 14, 2007 in an action for, inter alia, wrongful death. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant LaFayette Central School District, by and through its agents, officers, and/or em[1406]*1406ployees, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claim against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the complaint and cross claim against defendant LaFayette Central School District, by and through its agents, officers, and/or employees, are dismissed.

Same memorandum as in Davis v Marzo (55 AD3d 1404 [2008]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Fahey, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.3d 1405, 864 N.Y.S.2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camaione-v-marzo-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack