Camacho Vs. Dist. Ct. (Philip Morris Usa, Inc.)

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 19, 2021
Docket82654
StatusPublished

This text of Camacho Vs. Dist. Ct. (Philip Morris Usa, Inc.) (Camacho Vs. Dist. Ct. (Philip Morris Usa, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camacho Vs. Dist. Ct. (Philip Morris Usa, Inc.), (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SANDRA CAMACHO, INDIVIDUALLY; No. 82654 AND ANTHONY CAMACHO, INDIVIDUALLY, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STAtE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NOV 1 9 2021 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE EUZABETH BROWN NADIA KRALL, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERK OF SU COURT Respondents, BY U CLERK and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION; RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO THE UNITED STATES TOBACCO BUSINESS OF BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, WHICH IS THE SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY; LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, A FOREIGN CORPORATION; AND ASM NATIONWIDE CORPORATION, D/B/A SILVERADO SMOKES & CIGARS, A DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, No. 83724 A FOREIGN CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY SUPREME COURT AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF NEVADA

OD 1947A aleeD š341/ TO THE UNITED STATES TOBACCO BUSINESS OF BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, WHICH IS THE SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE NADIA KRALL, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and SANDRA CAMACHO, INDIVIDUALLY; ANTHONY CAMACHO, INDIVIDUALLY; PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION; - LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, A FOREIGN CORPORATION; AND ASM NATIONWIDE CORPORATION, D/B/A SILVERADO SMOKES & CIGARS, A DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER

Cause appearing, and despite real party in interest, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's opposition, petitioners motion for a voluntary dismissal of the petition in Docket No. 82654 is granted. The petition is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). The parties to bear their own attorney fees and costs. SUPREME COURT OF PkVADA

(0) 1947A el. 2 R.J. Reynolds motions to consolidate these matters are denied as moot. It is so ORDERED.

-C24-'6%E-7 Parraguirre J.

J. Stiglich

Silver

cc: Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge Kelley Uustal/Fort Lauderdale Claggett & Sykes Law Firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP/Kansas City Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas Bailey Kennedy Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP/Miami Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

109 1947A atOti. 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Camacho Vs. Dist. Ct. (Philip Morris Usa, Inc.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camacho-vs-dist-ct-philip-morris-usa-inc-nev-2021.