Home/New York Court of Appeals/Camacho v. Tabak

Camacho v. Tabak

223 N.E.2d 33, 18 N.Y.2d 883, 276 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1003
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 22, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 223 N.E.2d 33 (Camacho v. Tabak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camacho v. Tabak, 223 N.E.2d 33, 18 N.Y.2d 883, 276 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1003 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

[885]*885Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Keating dissents and votes to reverse and to grant a new trial upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 N.E.2d 33, 18 N.Y.2d 883, 276 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camacho-v-tabak-ny-1966.