Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland

529 So. 2d 360, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1924, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3708, 1988 WL 82673

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1988·No. No. 88-250·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting the appellee personal representative an extension of time to refile its objection to the claim of the appellant. We do not. agree.

It is within the broad discretion of the trial court to grant or deny an extension of time, and the exercise of that discretion will usually be upheld unless it is totally unreasonable. In re Estate of Robins, 463 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Baldwin v. Lewis, 397 So.2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting the appellee personal representative an extension of time to refile its objection to the claim of the appellant. We do not. agree.

It is within the broad discretion of the trial court to grant or deny an extension of time, and the exercise of that discretion will usually be upheld unless it is totally unreasonable. In re Estate of Robins, 463 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Baldwin v. Lewis, 397 So.2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland, 529 So. 2d 360, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1924, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3708, 1988 WL 82673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

529 So. 2d 360 (Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related