Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving and Print. Co.
52 N.E. 1124, 158 N.Y. 663, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 717
This text of 52 N.E. 1124 (Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving and Print. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving and Print. Co., 52 N.E. 1124, 158 N.Y. 663, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 717 (N.Y. 1899).
Opinion
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, on authority of Sidwell v. Greig (157 N. Y. 30).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sidwell v. . Greig
51 N.E. 267 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 N.E. 1124, 158 N.Y. 663, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camacho-v-hamilton-bank-note-engraving-and-print-co-ny-1899.