Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving and Print. Co.

52 N.E. 1124, 158 N.Y. 663, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 717
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 1899·Published

Opinion

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, on authority of Sidwell v. Greig (157 N. Y. 30).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving and Print. Co., 52 N.E. 1124, 158 N.Y. 663, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 717 (N.Y. 1899).

52 N.E. 1124 (Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving and Print. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sidwell v. . Greig
51 N.E. 267 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)