Camacho v. Fondo Del Seguro
This text of Camacho v. Fondo Del Seguro (Camacho v. Fondo Del Seguro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1205
ANA MARIA CAMACHO,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
FONDO DEL SEGURO DEL ESTADO, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Miguel E. Miranda on brief for appellant. Zaida Prieto-Rivera on brief for appellee Fondo Del Seguro Del Estado.
July 7, 1997
Per Curiam.
As appellant did not file a motion under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 50 before the district court, and as she has not
provided us with transcripts of the jury trial, we are unable
to review her contention that the evidence was such that the
jury's verdict should be set aside. See Hammond v. T.J. Litle
& Co., 82 F.3d 1166, 1171 (1st Cir. 1996); Muniz Ramirez v.
Puerto Rico Fire Services, 757 F.2d 1357, 1358 (1st Cir. 1985).
Moreover, our review of the documents included in appellant's
appendix suggests that the jury may have resolved conflicting
evidence about defendants' conduct or other elements of the
claim; in no event would we second-guess the jury's
determination of the weight and credibility due that evidence.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Camacho v. Fondo Del Seguro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camacho-v-fondo-del-seguro-ca1-1997.