Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan

D. Guam

Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan

1 Guam 406

CourtDistrict Court, D. Guam

DecidedJuly 28, 1970

DocketCivil No. 61-A

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Guam 406 (Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Guam primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan, 1 Guam 406 (gud 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The decision of the lower court is affirmed.

There is adequate support in the record for the Court’s conclusion that the petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

In prosecuting this stale claim, the petitioner has demonstrated the reason for the application of the statute of limitations. The record in the lower court is filled with [407]*407contentions that are so remote as to time that it is difficult to find them credible. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The decision of the lower court is affirmed.

There is adequate support in the record for the Court’s conclusion that the petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

In prosecuting this stale claim, the petitioner has demonstrated the reason for the application of the statute of limitations. The record in the lower court is filled with [407]*407contentions that are so remote as to time that it is difficult to find them credible. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Guam 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camacho-v-estate-of-pangelinan-gud-1970.