Camacho v. COURT REPORTER

30 A.3d 1102, 612 Pa. 315, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2563
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 24, 2011·No. 63 EM 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2011, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Complaint,” treated as a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, is *316 DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camacho v. COURT REPORTER, 30 A.3d 1102, 612 Pa. 315, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2563 (Pa. 2011).

30 A.3d 1102 (Camacho v. COURT REPORTER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.