Camacho-Ortiz v. Rodriguez

402 Mass. 1002
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 16, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 402 Mass. 1002 (Camacho-Ortiz v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camacho-Ortiz v. Rodriguez, 402 Mass. 1002 (Mass. 1988).

Opinion

In this case, the plaintiff, Margarita Camacho-Ortiz, appeals from the grant of summary judgment for the defendant, Addie’s, Inc., doing business as Pal Joey’s, in a negligence action commenced pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 60F (1986 ed.). We transferred the case to this court on our own motion. Where summary judgment was granted on the ground that the court was without authority to enlarge the ninety-day period provided for filing an affidavit, see G. L. c. 231, § 60F (1986 ed.), that ruling was in error. See Croteau v. Swansea Lounge, Inc., ante 419 (1988), decided today.

Carol A. C’Miel for Addie’s, Inc. Peter Slepchuk, Jr., for the plaintiff.

The order of the Superior Court granting the motion for summary judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 60F
Massachusetts § 60F

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 Mass. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camacho-ortiz-v-rodriguez-mass-1988.