Camac v. Allwine
4 F. Cas. 1085, 1 Wash. C. C. 466
This text of 4 F. Cas. 1085 (Camac v. Allwine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Camac v. Allwine, 4 F. Cas. 1085, 1 Wash. C. C. 466 (circtdpa 1806).
Opinion
THE COURT
absent) refused to interfere in a summary way;, and said that the dispute, about what is due, would alone be conclusive, even if it were otherwise proper, to relieve in this way. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 F. Cas. 1085, 1 Wash. C. C. 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camac-v-allwine-circtdpa-1806.