Camac v. Allwine

4 F. Cas. 1085, 1 Wash. C. C. 466
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

THE COURT

(PETERS, District Judge,

absent) refused to interfere in a summary way;, and said that the dispute, about what is due, would alone be conclusive, even if it were otherwise proper, to relieve in this way. Rule discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camac v. Allwine, 4 F. Cas. 1085, 1 Wash. C. C. 466 (circtdpa 1806).

4 F. Cas. 1085 (Camac v. Allwine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.