Calvin v. La Farge

New York Supreme Court

Calvin v. La Farge

6 Wend. 505

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 23, 1830

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Wend. 505 (Calvin v. La Farge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calvin v. La Farge, 6 Wend. 505 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The general provisions in the Revised Statutes, 2 vol. p. 356, § 27, allowing a plaintiff to reply, and a defendant to rejoin several matters, &c. with leave of the court, are not applicable to the action of replevin. The legislature have enacted every thing in relation to that action in a distinct chapter, and the mode of pleading, &c. is particularly prescribed. 2 R. S. 521, 528, § 38 and 529, § 45. The motion therefore must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The general provisions in the Revised Statutes, 2 vol. p. 356, § 27, allowing a plaintiff to reply, and a defendant to rejoin several matters, &c. with leave of the court, are not applicable to the action of replevin. The legislature have enacted every thing in relation to that action in a distinct chapter, and the mode of pleading, &c. is particularly prescribed. 2 R. S. 521, 528, § 38 and 529, § 45. The motion therefore must be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Wend. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvin-v-la-farge-nysupct-1830.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack