Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, A/K/A F.I.E., A/K/A Div. Dresser Ind. Inc., Cross-Appellee

Fifth Circuit

Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, A/K/A F.I.E., A/K/A Div. Dresser Ind. Inc., Cross-Appellee

49 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6000, 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 981, 1995 WL 121686

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 1995

Docket92-3770

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 49 F.3d 127 (Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, A/K/A F.I.E., A/K/A Div. Dresser Ind. Inc., Cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, A/K/A F.I.E., A/K/A Div. Dresser Ind. Inc., Cross-Appellee, 49 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6000, 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 981, 1995 WL 121686 (5th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for *128 rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI