Calvin Moore v. Mr. Witham

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 23, 2022
Docket22-6715
StatusUnpublished

This text of Calvin Moore v. Mr. Witham (Calvin Moore v. Mr. Witham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calvin Moore v. Mr. Witham, (4th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6715 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6715

CALVIN MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. WITHAM, Warden; MRS. CARTER, Head Nurse; MRS. TARASOVA, Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00650-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6715 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with the court’s order. On appeal, we

confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because

Moore’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170,

177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit

rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey
775 F.3d 170 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Calvin Moore v. Mr. Witham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvin-moore-v-mr-witham-ca4-2022.