Calvin Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 17, 2012
Docket06-11-00132-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Calvin Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club (Calvin Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calvin Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

No. 06-11-00132-CV ______________________________

CALVIN MONASCO, Appellant

V.

GILMER BOATING AND FISHING CLUB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial Court No. 748-07

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION

Calvin Monasco has filed a notice of appeal against a judgment of contempt entered

against him by the 115th Judicial District Court of Upshur County. Generally, only final

decisions of trial courts are appealable. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.

2001); Hinde v. Hinde, 701 S.W.2d 637, 639 (Tex. 1985); N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400

S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966); see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.012 (West Supp.

2011) (final judgment of district and county courts). The Legislature has also authorized the

appeal of a number of interlocutory orders, not including orders of contempt. See, e.g., TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2011).

An order holding a person in contempt is not one from which an appeal may be brought.

Ex parte Cardwell, 416 S.W.2d 382, 384 (Tex. 1967); Pandozy v. Beaty, 254 S.W.3d 613, 616

(Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243 (Tex. 1985)).

Relief is available only through application for a writ of habeas corpus. Grimes v. Grimes, 706

S.W.2d 340, 343 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1986, writ dism’d) (citing Wagner v. Warnasch, 259

S.W.2d 890, 893 (Tex. 1956)). We, therefore, may not accept jurisdiction over this appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter Justice

2 Date Submitted: February 16, 2012 Date Decided: February 17, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pandozy v. Beaty
254 S.W.3d 613 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Roberts v. Knoxville Transit Lines
259 S.W.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1952)
Ex Parte Williams
690 S.W.2d 243 (Texas Supreme Court, 1985)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
North East Independent School District v. Aldridge
400 S.W.2d 893 (Texas Supreme Court, 1966)
Hinde v. Hinde
701 S.W.2d 637 (Texas Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex Parte Cardwell
416 S.W.2d 382 (Texas Supreme Court, 1967)
Grimes v. Grimes
706 S.W.2d 340 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Calvin Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvin-monasco-v-gilmer-boating-and-fishing-club-texapp-2012.