Calvin Louis Anderson Bey v. United States

683 F.2d 1218, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 1982
Docket82-1253
StatusPublished

This text of 683 F.2d 1218 (Calvin Louis Anderson Bey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calvin Louis Anderson Bey v. United States, 683 F.2d 1218, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540 (8th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Louis Anderson Bey, pro se, appeals from the district court’s 1 order dismissing his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On appeal appellant contends his original sentence should be overturned because it had been based on erroneous information contained in a presentence investigative report and because he had not received effective legal assistance at the sentencing hearing.

We have carefully examined the record and briefs in this matter and find no merit in appellant’s contentions. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 12(a).

1

. The Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 F.2d 1218, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvin-louis-anderson-bey-v-united-states-ca8-1982.