Calvin L. Blaine v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General of Virginia

859 F.2d 149, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13900
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 1988
Docket88-6693
StatusUnpublished

This text of 859 F.2d 149 (Calvin L. Blaine v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calvin L. Blaine v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General of Virginia, 859 F.2d 149, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13900 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

859 F.2d 149
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Calvin L. BLAINE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Attorney General of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-6693.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1988.
Decided Sept. 19, 1988.

Calvin L. Blaine, appellant pro se.

Robert B. Condon, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin L. Blaine seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Blaine v. Commonwealth of Virginia, C/A No. 88-28-D (W.D.Va. June 7, 1988). As explained by the district court, Blaine must first present his claims to the Virginia courts for disposition before the federal courts will entertain them under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Blaine's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Mackall
859 F.2d 149 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 F.2d 149, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvin-l-blaine-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-attorne-ca4-1988.