Calvin E. Thomas v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Calvin E. Thomas v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2015·No. 149 SSM 12·Published

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 149 SSM 12 Calvin E. Thomas, Respondent,

v.

New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Submitted by Patrick J. Lawless, for appellant. Submitted by Blake G. Goldfarb, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that court, and certified question answered in the negative. The allegations in the notice of claim were not sufficient to put defendant on notice of the allegations in the bill of particulars concerning the handrail. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided June 4, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 149 SSM 12 Calvin E. Thomas, Respondent,

v.

New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Submitted by Patrick J. Lawless, for appellant. Submitted by Blake G. Goldfarb, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that court, and certified question answered in the negative. The allegations in the notice of claim were not sufficient to put defendant on notice of the allegations in the bill of particulars concerning the handrail. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided June 4, 2015

Calvin E. Thomas v. New York City Housing Authority, (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

Calvin E. Thomas v. New York City Housing Authority (Calvin E. Thomas v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.