Calvin Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp
This text of Calvin Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp (Calvin Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1212
CALVIN EARL BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SEARS HOLDING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Kmart Corporation #7080; THOMAS M. COLCLOUGH, Director US EEOC, Raleigh Area Office; STEVE DOOLEY; RAJENONAKYMAR PATEL; JAYESH PATEL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:14-cv-00033-D)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Paul S. Holscher, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, David A. Hughes, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Roberto Francisco Ramirez, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Calvin Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order
denying his second motion to reconsider the court’s earlier
order denying his civil action alleging employment
discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse
of discretion by the district court. See Werner v. Carbo, 731
F.2d 204, 206 (4th Cir. 1984) (noting review standard for Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b) denial). * Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Because Brown’s motion to reconsider was filed greater than 28 days after the district court’s order dismissing his civil action, the district court’s review was under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Calvin Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvin-brown-v-sears-holding-management-corp-ca4-2016.