Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak
This text of Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak (Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Attorney General 2 CRAIG A. NEWBY (Bar No. 8591) Deputy Solicitor General 3 State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 4 100 North Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 5 (775) 684-1100 (phone) (775) 684-1108 (fax) 6 Email: CNewby@ag.nv.gov 7 Attorneys for State Defendants 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY Case No. 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF 12 Plaintiff, vs. CONSENT DECREE 13 STEVE SISOLAK, in his official capacity 14 as Governor of Nevada, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 18 On March 12, 2020, the Governor of the State of Nevada issued an Emergency 19 Declaration in response to the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. See Governor 20 Steve Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for COVID-19, https://bit.ly/3jnk6CR. The 21 Emergency Declaration remains in effect until the Governor issues an order declaring an 22 end to the emergency. Pursuant to the Emergency Declaration, the Governor issued 23 Emergency Directive 021 on May 29, 2020. See Governor Steve Sisolak, Declaration of 24 Emergency Directive 021 – Phase Two Reopening Plan, https://bit.ly/2MOoYoj. The 25 Directive and related official guidance imposed a 50-person attendance limit on indoor 26 services in houses of worship. 27 Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley (“the Church”) brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 28 1983 against the Governor and the Attorney General of Nevada (collectively “Nevada” or 2 in its Amended Complaint that the 50-person attendance limit under Directive 021 and 3 related official State guidance violated the Free Exercise, Speech, and Assembly Clauses 4 of the First Amendment. See generally ECF 8. The church requested preliminary and 5 permanent injunctive relief prohibiting the Defendants from enforcing that limit on indoor 6 worship services and a judgment declaring the limit was unconstitutional, both facially and 7 as-applied. Id.; ECF 19 (motion for preliminary injunction). This Court denied the Church’s 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, relying largely on South Bay United Pentecostal Church 9 v. Newsom, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1613, 207 L.Ed.2d 154 (2020) (mem.), and the Church 10 appealed. See Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, 2020 WL 4260438 (D. Nev. June 11 11, 2020). 12 The Ninth Circuit held that the Church demonstrated a likelihood of success on the 13 merits of its free-exercise claim, based on Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141 14 S. Ct. 63, 67, 208 L. Ed. 2d 206 (2020), that the Church established any enforcement of the 15 50-person attendance limit would cause irreparable harm, and that an injunction was in 16 the public interest. Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, 982 F.3d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir. 17 2020), cert. denied, No. 20-639 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2021). Accordingly, the court of appeals 18 reversed, instructed this Court to employ strict scrutiny to its review of Directive 021, and 19 preliminarily enjoined the State from imposing attendance limits on indoor religious 20 gatherings that are less favorable than 25% of the listed fire code capacity. Id. The 25% 21 attendance limit is the same limit that, under Emergency Directive 035, Nevada has 22 imposed on certain commercial entities, including “casinos; bowling alleys, arcades, 23 miniature golf facilities, amusement parks, and theme parks; restaurants, food 24 establishments, breweries, distilleries, and wineries; museums, art galleries, zoos, and 25 aquariums; and gyms, fitness facilities, and fitness studios.” Id. at 1230 n.1; see Governor 26 Steve Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for Directive 035, https://bit.ly/36B5vhD. The 27 State has subsequently increased the attendance limit to 50% for all applicable entities, 28 including houses of worship. See Governor Steve Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for 2 approval of local plans. See Governor State Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for Directive 3 041. 4 The parties have agreed to enter into this Consent Decree to resolve this matter 5 without further contested litigation. The parties agree that this Consent Decree resolves 6 all issues raised in the Church’s Amended Complaint (ECF 8) and Motion for Preliminary 7 Injunction (ECF 19) and is final and binding on the parties and their officials, agents, 8 employees, and successors. 9 II. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS 10 This Consent Decree is intended to resolve all claims by Calvary Chapel in its 11 Amended Complaint. 12 III. INJUNCTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE RELIEF 13 Nevada is permanently enjoined from: 14 1. Enforcing Directive 021’s and Directive 035’s numerical capacity limits 15 on indoor religious gatherings; and 16 2. Enforcing a percentage capacity limit on indoor religious gatherings 17 that is less favorable than the highest of the percentage capacity limits imposed on indoor: 18 (a) casinos; (b) entertainment venues (e.g., movie theaters, bowling alleys, arcades, 19 amusement parks, and theme parks); (c) food and spirits establishments (e.g., restaurants, 20 breweries, distilleries, wineries, and bars); (d) museums, art galleries, zoos, and 21 aquariums; and (e) gyms, fitness facilities, and fitness studios. 22 IV. DEFINITIONS 23 “Numerical capacity limit” means a fixed maximum number of persons (e.g., “the 24 occupancy shall not exceed 50 persons”). 25 “Percentage capacity limit” means a maximum number of persons expressed as a 26 fraction of 100 that is tied to a facility’s physical size (e.g., “the occupancy shall not exceed 27 25% of the listed fire code”). 28 / / / ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 2 1. Nevada agrees to pay the Church reasonable attorney's fees and 3 taxable and non-taxable costs for the work performed and costs incurred in this Court and 4 Ninth Circuit before the date of this Consent Decree.! If necessary State approvals from 5 ||the Board of Examiners and/or the Legislature’s Interim Finance Committee for any 6 || agreement on the amount of reasonable attorney fees and costs are not received by the end 7 business July 7, 2021, the Church shall file a fee and costs application with this Court 8 July 30, 2021. Both Nevada and the Church reserve the right to appeal this Court’s 9 || disposition of such application. 10 2. Separate from the previous paragraph, if (a) the Church seeks judicial 11 relief in enforcing this Consent Decree, and (b) the Church prevails in obtaining such relief 12 ||or Nevada corrects its alleged violation in response to the Church’s request for judicial 13 ||relief, Nevada agrees that it will pay the reasonable attorney’s fees and costs that the 14 || Church incurs in seeking such relief. If an agreement on the amount of reasonable attorney 15 and costs cannot be reached, the Church shall file a fee and costs application with this 16 || Court within 30 days of the date that this Court grants relief or that Nevada corrects its 17 || alleged violation. Both Nevada and the Church reserve the right to appeal this Court’s 18 || disposition of such application. 19 APPROVED and ORDERED May 138, 2021. AS” 21 ee RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 1 The Church’s application for attorney’s fees and non-taxable costs incurred during 27 || Appeal No. 20-16169 is presently pending in the Ninth Circuit. See Cir. R. 39-1.6. The 28 parties will seek to stay consideration of that application in accordance with the terms of this stipulated consent decree.
2 For Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley: For the Governor and Attorney General: 3 /s/ Ryan J. Tucker /s/ Craig A. Newby 4 Ryan J. Tucker (AZ Bar 034382)* Craig A. Newby ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM Deputy Solicitor General 5 15100 N.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calvary-chapel-dayton-valley-v-sisolak-nvd-2021.