Calva v. Ashcroft
This text of 92 F. App'x 557 (Calva v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Antonio de la Rosa Calva, his wife, Mercedes de las Nieves de la Rosa Gomez, and their children, Pamela and Oscar de la Rosa Gomez (“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal.
Petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate their right to due process is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the BIA’s streamlining procedure does not violate an alien’s due process rights).
The Clerk is directed to stay the mandate pending the resolution of Desta v. Ashcroft, No. 03-70477, and further order of this Court.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F. App'x 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calva-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.