Caltabellotta v. Schmalz
This text of 254 A.D. 773 (Caltabellotta v. Schmalz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to direct the clerk to enter judgment in accordance with proposed judgment and to amend the clerk’s minutes affirmed, in so far as an appeal therefrom is taken, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. On an appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury herein, plaintiff may bring up the question of the correctness of the ruling of the court in excluding testimony concerning the panels and ceilings. A record presenting the one question may be prepared. (Boylan v. Southern Pacific Company, 253 App. Div. 195.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 773, 5 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caltabellotta-v-schmalz-nyappdiv-1938.