Calogero v. Bills Garage, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Calogero v. Bills Garage, Inc.

32 A.D.2d 786, 302 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 786 (Calogero v. Bills Garage, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calogero v. Bills Garage, Inc., 32 A.D.2d 786, 302 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant Bills Garage, Inc., as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 25, 1968, as is against it upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs, and new trial and severance of action granted as between plaintiff and appellant, unless,, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict insofar as it is in his favor against appellant, from $335,000 to $275,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant Bills Garage, Inc., as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 25, 1968, as is against it upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs, and new trial and severance of action granted as between plaintiff and appellant, unless,, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict insofar as it is in his favor against appellant, from $335,000 to $275,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 786, 302 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calogero-v-bills-garage-inc-nyappdiv-1969.