CALMESE v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

CALMESE v. State

272 S.W.3d 487, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2008 WL 5454123

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 16, 2008

DocketED 90870

StatusPublished

This text of 272 S.W.3d 487 (CALMESE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CALMESE v. State, 272 S.W.3d 487, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2008 WL 5454123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Cálmese appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Cálmese argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Cálmese appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Cálmese argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 S.W.3d 487, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2008 WL 5454123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calmese-v-state-moctapp-2008.