CALMESE v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

CALMESE v. State

272 S.W.3d 487, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2008 WL 5454123

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 2008·No. ED 90870·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Cálmese appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Cálmese argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Cálmese appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Cálmese argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).

CALMESE v. State, 272 S.W.3d 487, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1695, 2008 WL 5454123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

272 S.W.3d 487 (CALMESE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.