Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CALM RADIO CORP., et al., Case No. 22-cv-01708-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Vv. STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES CALM.COM, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant.
The Motion to Strike Certain of Calm.Com’s Affirmative Defenses is denied. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(2)(A); Free Speech Sys., LLC v. Menzel, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1162, 1176 (N.D. Cal. 2019); and Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., No. C 12-04936 LB, 2013 WL 3153388, at *6—7 (N.D. Cal. June 19, 2013). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 25, 2022 VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc. (Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.