Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California·Decided July 25, 2022·No. 3:22-cv-01708·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALM RADIO CORP., et al., Case No. 22-cv-01708-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Vv. STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES CALM.COM, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant.

The Motion to Strike Certain of Calm.Com’s Affirmative Defenses is denied. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(2)(A); Free Speech Sys., LLC v. Menzel, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1162, 1176 (N.D. Cal. 2019); and Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., No. C 12-04936 LB, 2013 WL 3153388, at *6—7 (N.D. Cal. June 19, 2013). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 25, 2022 VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2022).

Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc. (Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Free Speech Sys., LLC v. Menzel
390 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (N.D. California, 2019)