Calloway v. State
This text of 92 S.E. 944 (Calloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in admitting the evidence of the witness Collins, set out in ground 4 of the amendment to the motion for new trial, over the objections urged thereto. Certain portions of the evidence may have been objectionable, but the objection was made to it as a whole, and some of it was both relevant and material.
2. The court did not err in overruling the objections to, and in admitting, the testimony of the witness Sauls complained of in the 5th ground of ' the amendment to the motion for new trial.
3. The- evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction of the accused, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 944, 20 Ga. App. 189, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calloway-v-state-gactapp-1917.