Calloway v. Parole Board
This text of Calloway v. Parole Board (Calloway v. Parole Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
David L. Calloway,
Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JDB) Parole Board,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM
In response to the Order directing respondents to show cause why the writ of habeas
corpus should not issue, the United States has documented why the writ should not issue. See
United States’ Opposition to Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. 8]. By
Order of August 9, 2010, petitioner was given until September 10, 2010, to reply to the United
States’ opposition, but the order was returned to the Court as undelivered with an indication that
petitioner has been released from his incarceration. See Dkt. No. 12. It appearing that the habeas
petition is moot, the Court will summarily deny the petition and dismiss the case. A separate
Order accompanies this Memorandum.
s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge DATE: October 4, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Calloway v. Parole Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calloway-v-parole-board-dcd-2010.