Calloway v. Parole Board

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 4, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2010-0279·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

David L. Calloway,

Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JDB) Parole Board,

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM

In response to the Order directing respondents to show cause why the writ of habeas

corpus should not issue, the United States has documented why the writ should not issue. See

United States’ Opposition to Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. 8]. By

Order of August 9, 2010, petitioner was given until September 10, 2010, to reply to the United

States’ opposition, but the order was returned to the Court as undelivered with an indication that

petitioner has been released from his incarceration. See Dkt. No. 12. It appearing that the habeas

petition is moot, the Court will summarily deny the petition and dismiss the case. A separate

Order accompanies this Memorandum.

s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge DATE: October 4, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calloway v. Parole Board, (D.D.C. 2010).

Calloway v. Parole Board (Calloway v. Parole Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.