Calloway v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

414 So. 2d 655, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 1982·No. No. AE-380·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Calloway appeals from a final order of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission (Commission) establishing his presumptive parole release date (PPRD). We affirm.

The Commission properly calculated Calloway’s salient factor score of two (2) based on the age of his first conviction and his prior conviction for DWI. See Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.04(l)(b).

Aggravation was properly applied in establishing his PPRD because Calloway committed his present offense of conviction while on probation for a previous crime. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.-03(l)(b).

The offenses for which Calloway was on probation could not be used in calculating his salient factor score since adjudication of guilt was withheld. Florida Administrative Code 23-19.04(l)(a).

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calloway v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 414 So. 2d 655, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

414 So. 2d 655 (Calloway v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Parole & Probation Commission v. Griffin
497 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)