Calloway v. Camelot Manor Nursing Care Facility

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedDecember 14, 2004
DocketI.C. NO. 247790.
StatusPublished

This text of Calloway v. Camelot Manor Nursing Care Facility (Calloway v. Camelot Manor Nursing Care Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calloway v. Camelot Manor Nursing Care Facility, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2004).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Dollar. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission reverses the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The Industrial Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case, the parties are properly before the Commission, and the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act at all relevant times.

2. Defendant was a duly qualified self-insured, with The Phoenix Fund/National Benefits Group as its servicing agent.

3. The employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all relevant times.

4. The date of the alleged injury is April 10, 2002.

5. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $303.81, which yields a compensation rate of $202.55 per week.

6. The issues for determination are:

a. Whether plaintiff sustained a compensable injury by accident to his hip arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment on April 10, 2002, and if so, to what benefits may he be entitled under the Act?

b. Whether plaintiff constructively refused gainful employment, causing a termination of his employment with his employer in May of 2002?

c. Is plaintiff's medical treatment causally related to an injury by accident at work?

d. Did plaintiff provide proper notice of his alleged injury by accident to his employer?

7. The parties stipulated the following documentary evidence:

a. Exhibit 1 — Medical records, twenty-nine pages;

b. Exhibit 2 — Workplace photograph,

c. Exhibit 3 — Defendant's Discovery Responses, ninety-three pages; and

d. Exhibit 4 — Plaintiff's Discovery Responses, thirty-four pages.

***********
Based upon the credible evidence of record and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing, plaintiff was forty-one years old and had completed the ninth grade. He had prior experience as a truck driver, farm worker and a construction worker. He began working for defendant-employer as a maintenance man in July of 2001, where his duties included working on the boiler, painting, lawn care, repairing wheelchairs, beds, kitchen equipment and water heaters.

2. At approximately age seven, plaintiff was run over by an automobile, sustaining severe injuries to his hip, back, and two fractured legs. Another automobile hit him at age fourteen, for which he required a full body cast for one year. Plaintiff stated that since age 21, his right hip pops out at least twice a month and that he twists and pops it back in place.

3. On April 10, 2002, plaintiff was assisting his supervisor, Fred Wilson, in repairing a water heater. Plaintiff was sitting on the floor with his legs crossed Indian-style and holding a spring-action door open when Mr. Wilson requested that plaintiff hand him a wrench. Plaintiff turned and twisted to his left and stretched to reach the wrench, which was 5-6 feet away. Plaintiff felt immediate pain. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff testified that at first he thought he had popped his hip out of place but that the pain he felt was severe in his lower right buttock and hip. Plaintiff further testified that this pain was different from his usual hip pain when his hip pops out because this time it burned, tingled and ran down his right leg.

4. Plaintiff also testified at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner that after Mr. Wilson completed the repairs, he felt the burning sensation for the rest of the day.

5. On April 11, 2002, plaintiff reported to work in severe pain and eventually had to leave work.

6. Plaintiff sought treatment at the emergency department of Caldwell Memorial Hospital in the afternoon of April 11, 2002 where he reported leg numbness after his right hip popped out of place on April 10, 2002. He related a history of an old fractured hip and leg injury after a motor vehicle accident in childhood and degenerative changes since that time. He further reported his hip would dislocate with minimal activity a couple of times each month, and he is usually able to put it back in himself and normally the hip is sore afterwards but this time it was more painful and he had numbness going down the medial portion of his leg. An x-ray was ordered, which revealed an old avulsion deformity of the inferior-anterior left iliac spine. No right pelvic or hip abnormality was detected. Dr. Wendy Stout examined plaintiff, prior medical records and the diagnostic study, and diagnosed him with a right hip sprain from overexertion. He was instructed to follow-up with an orthopedist in five to seven days. Dr. Stout authorized plaintiff to remain out of work for four days and released him to restricted duty on crutches as of April 16, 2002.

7. On April 15, 2002, plaintiff sought treatment at Carolina Orthopaedic Specialists, where Dr. John T. McCormick examined him. At this appointment, plaintiff reported a history of progressive right sciatica beginning on April 10, 2002 after working on a water heater at work. He noted plaintiff stated he was sitting for 20 minutes; legs crossed underneath him "Indian-style" and bent over to work on this water heater, when he began experiencing pain. Dr. McCormick previously treated plaintiff for surgery on his left calcaneus. Dr. McCormick diagnosed plaintiff with right sciatica, probably a herniated disc at L5-S1 on the right. He authorized plaintiff to remain out of work until April 18, 2002.

8. Plaintiff worked intermittently and in a light duty capacity between April 10, 2002 and May 9, 2002. However, the plaintiff testified at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner that Mr. Wilson terminated plaintiff's employment with the defendant on May 9, 2002 after the plaintiff missed work on May 6,7,8, and 9, 2002, resulting in him having 3 No-Call/No-Shows, notwithstanding the fact that on May 9, 2002, Dr. McCormick retroactively excused the plaintiff from work from April 10, 2002 to July 1, 2002 and notwithstanding the fact that plaintiff testified that he presented Dr. McCormick's note to Mr. Wilson on May 9, 2002, a fact which Mr. Wilson acknowledged at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as he testified that the note did indeed exist in the file at work on May 9, 2002 and he knew this on May 9, 2002 even as the plaintiff turned in his uniform, his pager and his keys.

9. On September 25, 2002, Dr. Richard Shelsky of Pain Relief Centers examined plaintiff for low back pain. At that time, plaintiff reported a history of sitting on the floor repairing a hot water heater at work when he twisted to reach for a wrench and developed a severe low back pain that radiated into his right lower extremity. He reported having low back pain for many years. Dr. Shelsky performed a lumbar epidural corticosteroid injection at L5-S1 on September 27, 2002. Plaintiff reported an exacerbation of his back pain after the injection.

10. On October 8, 2002, plaintiff returned to Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(6)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Calloway v. Camelot Manor Nursing Care Facility, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calloway-v-camelot-manor-nursing-care-facility-ncworkcompcom-2004.